Multiple awards.

Focus Markenrecht
de

LHR obtains preliminary injunction against Google review about tax advisors

Your contact person
© Studio Romantic – Adobe Stock

The Regional Court of Fulda (LG Fulda, Beschluss v. 25.10.2023, Az. 3 O 110/23) issued an interim injunction in favor of a tax consultancy firm at the request of LHR.

This prohibits an entrepreneur from making a negative review with six untrue factual claims publicly accessible in the applicant’s “Google My Business” profile. 

In the event of non-compliance, a fine of up to € 250,000, or alternatively up to 6 months imprisonment, may be imposed. The amount in dispute is € 50,000.

The Fulda Regional Court agreed with our client that the review violated the tax consultants’ general right to privacy.

Groundless accusations from a failed entrepreneur

The company, a former client of the applicant, had miscalculated its pricing during the coronavirus years and was dissatisfied with the company’s results. Instead of taking this as an opportunity to improve the management, the defendant not only wanted to hold the applicant responsible for these economic failures, but also to seek compensation from the applicant’s financial loss liability insurance.

Valuation blackmail

As part of this plan, he sent an email to the applicant on 25.8.2022 in which he threatened the public Google review in question in the event that the applicant did not comply with his demands.

Instead of taking legal action and asserting the claims to which he was allegedly entitled in court, the defendant carried out his threat approximately one year later, at the end of August 2023, and published the announced public Google review. There he made serious but unfounded allegations of alleged errors in advice.

Regional court affirms infringement of personality rights

The Fulda Regional Court followed the opinion of the applicants and prohibited the public statements. The order was issued without an oral hearing and without reasons. It is not legally binding and can still be challenged by the defendant with an objection.

However, it is provisionally enforceable. The defendant must therefore delete the rating immediately and the statements if he wishes to avoid administrative remedies. The costs of the claim were also imposed on him.

Practical handbook for enforcing claims in competition law

2nd, completely revised and updated edition

Arranged chronologically, differentiated structure, numerous cross-references and, brand new: Extensive practical information on every process situation.

Learn more

Praxishandbuch Anspruchsdurchsetzung im Wettbewerbsrecht